Freikorp ( talk) 04:53, (UTC) Why not improve it instead of tagging it then? Tags are annoying and just make an article uglier, I'd sooner remove the whole paragraph than have that ugly tag on it. As per Wikipedia's guidelines please discuss this issue here so we can reach a consensus rather than just removing the tag because you disagree with it. I've added the Template:More plot tag to the article because I think the current plot is more of a teaser than a plot it does not explain the whole narrative. Quotemstr ( talk) 21:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC) Plot tag It's a notable work and its page should stay. Photopia is a landmark in IF an won several awards for its groundbreaking narrative structure. (your reason here) - Quotemstr ( talk) 21:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC) This page is not unambiguously promotional, because. This notification is provided by a Bot - CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC) If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review.If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale.The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. Adam Conover † 21:44, (UTC) File:Photopia computer game screenshot.png Nominated for speedy Deletion Īn image used in this article, File:Photopia computer game screenshot.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 22 November 2011 What should I do?ĭon't panic you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). I'm changing this article to be in line with Inform. This page states "While Photopia is not a true example of puzzleless interactive fiction, it is regarded as a pioneer," while the Inform article lists "Photopia, by Adam Cadre, is generally credited as being the first truly puzzleless work of interactive fiction." I would presume one or both articles needs to be changed, or more information needs to be given to contextualize the various points of view. Isn't defining this game "a piece of literature" inherently non-NPOV? -Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.221.30.243 ( talk) 11:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Puzzleless, or not? Maybe there is an existing list with which this can be merged? Aidalgol ( talk) 01:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC) From what I've found on the web about this game, there doesn't seem to be enough to say about it to warrant an entire article. I think this article needs to be completely rewritten or just scrapped. 3 File:Photopia computer game screenshot.png Nominated for speedy Deletion.
0 kommentar(er)
